Hybrid Security ROI Planner
Tell us a few facts about your property and we'll model three hybrid scenarios — Conservative, Balanced, Aggressive — with savings, payback, and the package that fits.
How the planner works
Answer a few buyer-known facts
Property type, sites, current hours, optional bill rate. Skip anything you don't know — we use ICP defaults and flag the result accordingly.
See three side-by-side scenarios
Conservative keeps the most on-site staff; Aggressive replaces the most. Each scenario lands on a Silver / Gold / Platinum package you can verify on /pricing.
Get a branded report
Email yourself the full breakdown — all three scenarios, operational impact, payback, three-year net savings. Forward it to your CFO or board.
All numbers are sized from category-typical assumptions for LA/OC. A live walk-through tightens them with your real bill rate, device inventory, and site complexity.
Which kind of property are we modeling?
Picks the ICP-specific assumptions we use for monitoring cost, dispatch volume, and the operational picture on the results screen.
How we calculate savings
The planner compares your current annual cost against a modeled hybrid program over a three-year horizon. Each scenario uses a different displacement assumption — the percentage of your current on-site hours we expect to replace with remote monitoring + mobile response.
Current annual cost: weekly guard hours × bill rate × 52 + existing monitoring fees × 12, multiplied by your site count.
Hybrid annual cost: 24/7 remote monitoring + retained on-site hours + extra-dispatch fees + amortized equipment, credited for cameras you can reuse.
Payback months = net capex ÷ monthly savings. 3-year ROI = (3-year net savings ÷ net capex) × 100. Both surface as "N/A" when there's no positive monthly cash flow or no equipment to depreciate.
Recommended package snaps to the /pricing bands. The Conservative / Balanced / Aggressive switcher changes monitoring intensity, dispatch fees, and how much on-site staffing you retain — not what we count.
